🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.