🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that could add as many as five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to lift a federal judge's block that had invalidated the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to revert to the boundaries drawn after the 2020 census for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was actually authored by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a breach of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The ruling comes amid a national contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican hold. Typically, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that are estimated to yield a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes aligned with his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives criticized the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

Another leading House figure stated the court had once again damaged its standing by upholding a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.