🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that prevented Australian-based users from seeing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an order sought by the online safety regulator.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in last year, the regulator applied to the review board to assess and rate the available footage. The board initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a rating that allowed the commissioner to instruct social media companies to geo-block the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos related to the Kirk incident. It also appealed a similar ruling on a separate video—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

Arguing its case, X contended that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or offensive, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that generated extensive public discourse". X drew a parallel between the video and the well-known recording of the JFK shooting.

The majority of the classification panel ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary could have met that threshold. As a result, the panel changed the classification of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

A minority on the panel disagreed, arguing the post was "content designed for sharing for the likely purposes of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as that footage was made public years after the assassination, "after public sentiment around the matter had subsided".

Response Following the Decision

In a statement on its global government affairs account, the platform welcomed the decision.

"We challenged this decision to defend freedom of expression and the critical nature of public access about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to protecting these fundamental values."

Representatives for the safety regulator acknowledged the board's decision, but noted that the new R18+ rating now means platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians who are minors".

Broader Context on Sensitive Footage

Separately, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were distressing, they did not reach the high threshold for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, platforms have been instructed to apply warning labels and interstitials, such as obscuring the image, on this material in line with their existing community guidelines.